Choosing Your Startup Tech Stack 2025: Decision Guide (Next.js, React, Python)
Complete framework to choose startup tech stack: Next.js vs React, Node vs Python, PostgreSQL vs MongoDB. Criteria, benchmarks, costs, mistakes to avoid.
Choosing Your Startup Tech Stack 2025: Decision Guide
80% of startups regret their initial stack choice. Average migration cost: €100K + 6 months. Here's the framework to choose the right stack from the start.
Decision Framework: 7 Criteria
1. Time-to-Market (Weight 30%)
Question: Which stack delivers fastest?
Factors:
- Available boilerplate (templates)
- Rich ecosystem (libs, packages)
- Learning curve
- Dev availability
Example:
- ✅ Next.js: Vercel templates → deploy in 1h
- ⚠️ Custom React + Node: 2-3 days setup
- ❌ Java Spring: 1-2 weeks setup
2. Talent Pool (Weight 25%)
Question: Easy to hire?
France 2025 Benchmark:
| Tech | Available Devs | Avg TJM | Hiring |
|---|---|---|---|
| JavaScript/TypeScript | 150K+ | €450 | ✅ Easy |
| React | 100K+ | €500 | ✅ Easy |
| Next.js | 30K+ | €550 | ✅ Medium |
| Python | 80K+ | €500 | ✅ Easy |
| Node.js | 60K+ | €480 | ✅ Easy |
| Vue.js | 40K+ | €480 | ⚠️ Medium |
| Go | 15K+ | €600 | ⚠️ Difficult |
| Rust | 5K+ | €700 | ❌ Very difficult |
| Elixir | 2K+ | €800 | ❌ Nearly impossible |
Golden Rule: If <20K devs in France, hiring risk
3. Scalability (Weight 15%)
Question: Holds up to how many users?
Benchmark:
| Stack | 0-10K users | 10K-100K | 100K-1M | 1M+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Next.js + Vercel | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ Costs |
| React + Node + AWS | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Python Django | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ Optimization | ⚠️ |
| Ruby on Rails | ✅ | ⚠️ | ❌ Slow | ❌ |
| PHP Laravel | ✅ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ❌ |
Note: 99% of startups will never reach 1M users
4. Cost (Weight 15%)
Total Cost of Ownership Year 1:
| Stack | Infra | Devs | Licenses | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Next.js (Vercel) | €2.4K | €60K | €0 | €62.4K |
| MERN (AWS) | €6K | €60K | €0 | €66K |
| Python (Railway) | €3.6K | €60K | €0 | €63.6K |
| .NET (Azure) | €8K | €65K | €0 | €73K |
| Enterprise Java | €12K | €70K | €5K | €87K |
Winner: Modern open-source stack + PaaS
5. Ecosystem (Weight 10%)
Library Richness:
| Stack | Packages | Quality | Docs |
|---|---|---|---|
| JavaScript (npm) | 2M+ | ⚠️ Variable | ✅ |
| Python (PyPI) | 500K+ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Java (Maven) | 500K+ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Go | 100K+ | ✅ | ⚠️ |
| Rust | 100K+ | ✅ | ⚠️ |
6. Maturity (Weight 3%)
Stability:
| Stack | Age | Stability | Breaking Changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next.js | 8 years | ⚠️ v15 = breaking | Annual |
| React | 12 years | ✅ | Rare |
| Vue | 10 years | ✅ | v3 = breaking (2020) |
| Node.js | 15 years | ✅ | Rare |
| Python | 33 years | ✅ | Rare |
| Go | 15 years | ✅ | Rare |
7. DX (Developer Experience) (Weight 2%)
Development Pleasure:
| Stack | Setup | Hot Reload | Debug | Satisfaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Next.js | 🟢 1h | 🟢 Fast | 🟢 | 9/10 |
| Vite + React | 🟢 30min | 🟢 Ultra fast | 🟢 | 9/10 |
| Create React App | 🟡 2h | 🟡 Slow | 🟡 | 6/10 |
| Django | 🟢 1h | 🟢 | 🟢 | 8/10 |
| Rails | 🟡 2h | 🟡 | 🟢 | 7/10 |
Recommended Stacks 2025 by Use Case
Use Case 1: B2B SaaS (dashboard, analytics)
Recommended Stack: Next.js 15 + tRPC + PostgreSQL + Vercel
Architecture:
Frontend: Next.js 15 (App Router)
├─ UI: shadcn/ui + Tailwind CSS
├─ State: Zustand
├─ Forms: React Hook Form + Zod
└─ Charts: Recharts
Backend: tRPC API (Next.js /app/api)
├─ ORM: Prisma
├─ Database: PostgreSQL (Supabase)
├─ Auth: NextAuth.js
├─ Payments: Stripe
└─ Jobs: Inngest (background tasks)
Infra: Vercel Edge
├─ CDN: Automatic
├─ Analytics: Vercel Analytics
└─ Monitoring: Sentry
Advantages:
- ✅ Full-stack TypeScript (optimal DX)
- ✅ 1-click deploy
- ✅ SSR + ISR for SEO
- ✅ Vercel Edge = ultra-fast
- ✅ End-to-end type-safety (tRPC)
Disadvantages:
- ❌ Vercel vendor lock-in (complex migration)
- ❌ Costs if >10K users (€300-500/month)
Year 1 Budget: €3K infra + €60K dev = €63K
Setup Time: 2-3 days
Use Case 2: Marketplace (supply + demand)
Recommended Stack: React + Node + MongoDB + AWS
Architecture:
Frontend: React 19 (Vite)
├─ Routing: React Router v7
├─ UI: Material-UI
├─ State: TanStack Query + Context
└─ Forms: Formik
Backend: Node.js + Express
├─ Database: MongoDB (Atlas)
├─ Search: Elasticsearch
├─ Storage: S3
├─ Queue: Bull + Redis
├─ Real-time: Socket.io
└─ Auth: Passport.js
Infra: AWS (EC2 + RDS + S3)
├─ Load balancer: ALB
├─ CDN: CloudFront
└─ Monitoring: CloudWatch + Datadog
Advantages:
- ✅ Flexible schema (MongoDB)
- ✅ Real-time (chat, notifications)
- ✅ Powerful search (Elasticsearch)
- ✅ No vendor lock-in
Disadvantages:
- ❌ Complex setup (DevOps required)
- ❌ AWS costs from start
Year 1 Budget: €8K infra + €70K dev = €78K
Setup Time: 1-2 weeks
Use Case 3: Mobile-first app (iOS + Android)
Recommended Stack: React Native + Expo + Supabase
Architecture:
Mobile: React Native + Expo
├─ Navigation: React Navigation
├─ UI: React Native Paper
├─ State: Zustand
└─ Offline: WatermelonDB
Backend: Supabase (BaaS)
├─ Database: PostgreSQL
├─ Auth: Supabase Auth
├─ Storage: Supabase Storage
├─ Real-time: Supabase Realtime
└─ Edge Functions: Deno
Push: Expo Notifications
Advantages:
- ✅ 1 codebase = iOS + Android
- ✅ Supabase = ready backend
- ✅ OTA updates (Expo)
- ✅ Minimal budget
Disadvantages:
- ❌ Performance < native (3D games impossible)
- ❌ Expo/Supabase dependency
Year 1 Budget: €1.5K infra + €65K dev = €66.5K
Setup Time: 1 week
Use Case 4: E-commerce (physical products)
Recommended Stack: Next.js + Shopify Hydrogen OR Medusa.js
Option A: Shopify Hydrogen (no-code backend)
Architecture:
Frontend: Next.js + Shopify Hydrogen
├─ UI: Tailwind CSS
├─ Cart: Shopify Storefront API
└─ Checkout: Shopify Checkout
Backend: Shopify Admin
├─ Products: Shopify
├─ Orders: Shopify
├─ Inventory: Shopify
└─ Payments: Shopify Payments
Infra: Vercel
Advantages:
- ✅ 0 backend code
- ✅ Payments included
- ✅ Inventory management
Disadvantages:
- ❌ Shopify commission (2% + €0.30/transaction)
- ❌ Strong lock-in
Year 1 Budget: €3K infra + €30K dev = €33K + commissions
Option B: Medusa.js (open-source)
Architecture:
Frontend: Next.js
Backend: Medusa.js (Node.js)
├─ Products: PostgreSQL
├─ Cart: Medusa
├─ Orders: Medusa
└─ Payments: Stripe
Infra: Railway (backend) + Vercel (frontend)
Advantages:
- ✅ 0 commission (vs Shopify)
- ✅ 100% customizable
- ✅ Open-source
Disadvantages:
- ❌ Backend code required
- ❌ Inventory management to build
Year 1 Budget: €5K infra + €50K dev = €55K
Use Case 5: Data-intensive app (analytics, ML)
Recommended Stack: Python FastAPI + PostgreSQL + React
Architecture:
Frontend: React + Vite
├─ Charts: Plotly.js
├─ Tables: TanStack Table
└─ State: Redux Toolkit
Backend: Python FastAPI
├─ ORM: SQLAlchemy
├─ Database: PostgreSQL
├─ ML: scikit-learn / TensorFlow
├─ Data: Pandas / NumPy
└─ Cache: Redis
Infra: Railway (backend) + Vercel (frontend)
├─ Jobs: Celery + Redis
└─ Storage: S3
Advantages:
- ✅ Python = ML ecosystem
- ✅ FastAPI = performant
- ✅ Jupyter notebooks integration
Disadvantages:
- ❌ 2 languages (Python + JS)
- ❌ Manual type-safety
Year 1 Budget: €6K infra + €70K dev = €76K
Setup Time: 1 week
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Mistake #1: Hype Stack Without Reason
❌ Bad:
"We'll do Rust + WebAssembly because it's cool"
Problem:
- Hiring Rust devs = mission impossible
- Time-to-market x3
- Over-engineering
✅ Good:
"We do Next.js + Node because 100K devs available in France"
Mistake #2: Copy BigTech Stack
❌ Bad:
"Netflix uses microservices + Kafka, we'll do the same"
Problem:
- Netflix = 10K engineers, you = 2 devs
- Complexity kills startups
✅ Good:
"Netflix started with Ruby monolith. So do we."
Mistake #3: "Full-stack Developer" Stack
❌ Bad:
"I'll hire a fullstack JavaScript dev, he does everything"
Problem:
- Specialist > generalist
- 1 person = 1 SPOF (Single Point of Failure)
✅ Good:
"Frontend specialist + Backend specialist OR Senior fullstack + Specialized junior"
Mistake #4: Ignoring Hidden Costs
Example:
- AWS = "free" → €5K/month bill after 6 months
- Serverless = "cheap" → Cold starts + scale costs
✅ Calculate TCO (Total Cost of Ownership):
TCO Year 1 =
Infra costs
+ Developer salaries
+ Licenses (if any)
+ Migration costs (if pivot)
+ Opportunity cost (time-to-market)
Mistake #5: No Plan B (Exit Strategy)
❌ Bad:
"Vercel/Supabase vendor lock-in, we'll see later"
Problem:
- Migration = €100K + 6 months if issue
✅ Good:
"Vercel now, but architecture allows AWS migration if needed"
Strategy:
- Abstract dependencies (e.g.,
lib/db.tswraps Prisma) - Docker containers (portable)
- Infrastructure as Code (Terraform)
Decision Tree: Which Stack for ME?
Questions
Q1: Need SEO?
- Yes → Next.js SSR
- No → React SPA (Vite)
Q2: Mobile app?
- Yes → React Native + Expo
- No → Web responsive
Q3: Real-time (chat, collab)?
- Yes → Node.js + Socket.io OR Supabase Realtime
- No → REST API classic
Q4: Data/ML intensive?
- Yes → Python (FastAPI/Django)
- No → JavaScript/TypeScript
Q5: Limited dev budget (<€50K)?
- Yes → No-code backend (Supabase, Firebase) + Next.js
- No → Custom backend
Q6: Team <3 devs?
- Yes → Fullstack framework (Next.js, Remix)
- No → Microservices OK
Decision Tree Result
Early Startup (0-10 clients): → Next.js + Supabase + Vercel
- Time-to-market: 2-3 weeks
- Budget: €60K Year 1
Scale-up (10-100 clients): → React + Node + PostgreSQL + AWS
- Scalable architecture
- Budget: €80K Year 1
Mobile-first: → React Native + Expo + Supabase
- 1 codebase iOS+Android
- Budget: €65K Year 1
E-commerce: → Next.js + Shopify Hydrogen
- 0 backend code
- Budget: €35K Year 1 + commissions
Data/ML: → Python FastAPI + React + PostgreSQL
- ML ecosystem
- Budget: €75K Year 1
Migration: When to Change Stack?
Signals to Migrate
Red Flags:
- ❌ Impossible to hire (Elixir, Rust)
- ❌ Catastrophic perf (<1s load)
- ❌ Costs explode (x10 vs budget)
- ❌ Unmanageable tech debt (bugs > features)
- ❌ Abandoned technology (AngularJS, Meteor)
If 2+ red flags → Consider migration
Typical Migration Cost
Example: Rails → Next.js + Node
| Phase | Duration | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Audit | 1 week | €5K |
| New Stack POC | 2 weeks | €10K |
| Incremental Migration | 3-6 months | €60-120K |
| Bug Buffer | 1 month | €10K |
| TOTAL | 4-7 months | €85-145K |
ROI:
- Easier hiring (Ruby → JS)
- Perf x5
- Infra costs -40%
Break-even: 12-18 months
Conclusion: My 2025 Recommendation
Universal Startup Early Stack
If you don't know what to choose:
Frontend: Next.js 15 (App Router) + Tailwind CSS + shadcn/ui
Backend: tRPC (colocated with Next.js)
Database: PostgreSQL (Supabase)
Auth: NextAuth.js
Payments: Stripe
Hosting: Vercel
Monitoring: Sentry + Vercel Analytics
Why:
- ✅ Optimal time-to-market (2-3 weeks MVP)
- ✅ Huge talent pool (JS/TS)
- ✅ Scalable (100K users easy)
- ✅ Controlled costs (€3K infra/year)
- ✅ End-to-end type-safe
- ✅ Exit strategy possible (containerize → AWS)
Exceptions:
- Mobile-first → React Native + Expo
- Data/ML → Python FastAPI
- Enterprise → .NET/Java
Tech Stack Audit: Is your current stack adapted? Let's discuss in 30min.
About: Jérémy Marquer has built 30+ MVPs with 15 different stacks. Recommendation: Next.js 90% of the time.
Related articles
Scale a Tech Startup: From 10 to 100 Users Without Exploding
Practical guide to scale infrastructure, team and processes from 10 to 100 users. Architecture, monitoring, technical debt, budget. Avoid the pitfalls.
Next.js 15 vs React: Which Framework to Choose in 2025?
Complete comparison of Next.js 15 and React for your web project: performance, SEO, development, costs. Decision guide for CTOs and developers.
MVP in 15 Days: The Complete Guide for Fast-Moving Startups
Learn how to launch your MVP in 15 days with a proven methodology. Modern stack, agile development, and rapid production deployment.
